'No zone' approach in the management of penetrating neck injuries - an Australian Tertiary Trauma Centre experience.

PURPOSE: Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs), defined as deep to the platysma, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Management has evolved from a zone-based approach to a 'no zone' algorithm, resulting in reduced non-therapeutic neck exploration rates. The aim of this study was to examine PNIs and its management trends in an Australian tertiary trauma centre, to determine if a 'no zone' approach could be safely implemented in this population, as has been demonstrated internationally. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective observational study at a level 1 adult Australian tertiary trauma centre using prospectively collated data from January 2008 to December 2018. Observed data included age, gender, mechanism of injury, computed tomography angiography (CT-A) use and operative intervention. Patients were examined based on zone of injury and presenting signs - 'hard', 'soft' or 'asymptomatic'. Major outcomes were CT-A usage, positive CT-A correlation with therapeutic neck explorations and negative neck exploration rates. RESULTS: This study identified 238 PNI patients, with 204 selected for review. Most injuries occurred in zone 2 (71.6%), with soft signs accounting for 53.4% of cases. Over 10 years, CT-A utilization increased from 55% to 94.1%, with positive CT-As being more likely to yield therapeutic neck explorations. There was a general decreased trend in operative intervention but without a clear reduction in non-therapeutic neck explorations. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests similarities with results from around the world, demonstrating that the 'no zone' approach should be considered when managing PNIs, but with clinician discretion in individual cases.

National community disparities in prehospital penetrating trauma adjusted for income, 2020-2021.

INTRODUCTION: While Black individuals experienced disproportionately increased firearm violence and deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic, less is known about community level disparities. We sought to evaluate national community race and ethnicity differences in 2020 and 2021 rates of penetrating trauma. METHODS: We linked the 2018-2021 National Emergency Medical Services Information System databases to ZIP Code demographics. We stratified encounters into majority race/ethnicity communities (>50% White, Black, or Hispanic/Latino). We used logistic regression to compare penetrating trauma for each community in 2020 and 2021 to a combined 2018-2019 historical baseline. Majority Black and majority Hispanic/Latino communities were compared to majority White communities for each year. Analyses were adjusted for household income. RESULTS: We included 87,504,097 encounters (259,449 penetrating traumas). All communities had increased odds of trauma in 2020 when compared to 2018-2019, but this increase was largest for Black communities (aOR 1.4, [1.3-1.4]; White communities - aOR 1.2, [1.2-1.3]; Hispanic/Latino communities - aOR 1.1. [1.1-1.2]). There was a similar trend of increased penetrating trauma in 2021 for Black (aOR 1.2, [1.2-1.3]); White (aOR 1.2, [1.1-1.2]); Hispanic/Latino (aOR 1.1, [1.1-1.1]). Comparing penetrating trauma in each year to White communities, Black communities had higher odds of trauma in all years (2018/2019 - aOR 3.0, [3.0-3.1]; 2020 - aOR 3.3, [3.3-3.4]; 2021 - aOR 3.3, [3.2-3.2]). Hispanic/Latino also had more trauma each year but to a lesser degree (2018/2019 - aOR 2.0, [2.0-2.0]; 2020 - aOR 1.8, [1.8-1.9]; 2021 - aOR 1.9, [1.8-1.9]). CONCLUSION: Black communities were most impacted by increased penetrating trauma rates in 2020 and 2021 even after adjusting for income.

Increased Incidence and Mortality of Civilian Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury in Sweden: A Single-Center Registry-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating trauma to the head and neck has increased during the past decade in Sweden. The aim of this study was to characterize these injuries and evaluate the outcomes for patients treated at a tertiary trauma center. METHODS: Swedish trauma registry data were extracted on patients with head and neck injuries admitted to Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) between 2011 and 2019. Outcome information was extracted from hospital records, with the primary endpoints focusing on the physiological outcome measures and the secondary endpoints on the surgical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1436 patients with penetrating trauma, 329 with penetrating head and neck injuries were identified. Of the 329 patients, 66 (20%) had suffered a gunshot wound (GSW), 240 (73%) a stab wound (SW), and 23 (7%) an injury from other trauma mechanisms (OTMs). The median age for the corresponding 3 groups of patients was 25, 33, and 21 years, respectively. Assault was the primary intent, with 54 patients experiencing GSWs (81.8%) and 158 SWs (65.8%). Patients with GSWs had more severe injuries, worse admission Glasgow coma scale, motor, scores, and a higher intubation rate at the injury site. Most GSW patients underwent major surgery (59.1%) as the initial procedure and were more likely to have intracranial hemorrhage (21.2%). The 30-day mortality was 45.5% (n = 30) for GSWs, 5.4% (n = 13) for SWs, and 0% (n = 0) for OTMs. There was an annual increase in the incidence and mortality for GSWs and SWs. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2011 and 2019, an increasing annual trend was found in the incidence and mortality from penetrating head and neck trauma in Stockholm, Sweden. GSW patients experienced more severe injuries and intracranial hemorrhage and underwent more surgical interventions compared with patients with SWs and OTMs.

Incidence and characteristics of vascular trauma at a level 2 trauma center.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the significant number of trauma patients treated at level 2 trauma centers (L2TCs) in the United States, most of the literature describing vascular trauma is from level 1 trauma centers (L1TCs). Currently, trauma center designation criteria do not require vascular surgery as a necessary component service. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all trauma patients with a vascular surgery consultation seen at our L2TC between 2013 and 2018. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 3062 trauma patients evaluated at our L2TC, 110 (3.6%) had a vascular surgery consultation. Operative intervention was performed in 35.2% of consults, and 1.0% of all trauma patients had a vascular intervention. Average age was 57 years, and the majority were male (n = 75; 68.2%). Mean Injury Severity Score was 12.0 ± 9.6, and blunt injury (n = 77; 87.5%) was more common than penetrating (n = 11; 12.5%). The most common location of injury was the lower extremity (n = 23; 74.2%), followed by upper extremity (n = 3; 9.7%), chest (n = 2; 6.5%), neck (n = 2; 6.5%), and pelvis (n = 1; 3.2%). Endovascular interventions were performed by the vascular surgery service in 67.7% (n = 21) of all injuries. There was one amputation (3.2%) and one postoperative mortality (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: At our L2TC, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates at 30 days were substantially lower compared with previously reported data. However, mean injury severity score and the incidence of penetrating and polytrauma were also lower at our institution. Most patients were managed nonoperatively, but when they did require an operation, endovascular therapies were more commonly implemented. Vascular surgery should be considered an integral service in trauma level designation, and there is a need for further investigation of these outcomes in L2TCs.

Outcomes and potential for improvement in the prehospital treatment of penetrating chest injuries in a European metropolitan area: A retrospective analysis of 2009 - 2017.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients <45 years living in high-resource settings. However, penetrating chest injuries are still relatively rare in Europe - with an upwards trend. These cases are of particular interest to emergency medical services (EMS) due to available invasive treatment options like chest tube placement or resuscitative thoracotomy. To date, there is no sufficient data from Austria regarding penetrating chest trauma in a metropolitan area, and no reliable source to base decisions regarding further skill proficiency training on. METHODS: For this retrospective observational study, we screened all trauma emergency responses of the Viennese EMS between 01/2009 and 12/2017 and included all those with a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score ≥ IV (= potentially life-threatening). Data were derived from EMS mission documentations and hospital files, and for those cases with the injuries leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), we assessed the EMS cardiac arrest registry and consulted a forensic physician. RESULTS: We included 480 cases of penetrating chest injuries of NACA IV-VII (83% male, 64% > 30 years old, 74% stab wounds, 16% cuts, 8% gunshot wounds, 56% inflicted by another party, 26% self-inflicted, 18% unknown). In the study period, the incidence rose from 1.4/100,000 to 3.5/100,000 capita, and overall, about one case was treated per week. In the cases with especially severe injury patterns (= NACA V-VII, 43% of total), (tension-)pneumothorax was the most common injury (29%). The highest mortality was seen in injuries to pulmonary vessels (100%) or the heart (94%). Fifty-eight patients (12% of total) deceased, whereas in 15 cases, the forensic physician stated survival could theoretically have been possible. However, only five of these CPR patients received at least unilateral thoracostomy. Regarding all penetrating chest injuries, thoracostomy had only been performed in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Severe cases of penetrating chest trauma are rare in Vienna and happened about once a week between 2009 and 2017. Both incidence and case load increased over the years, and potentially life-saving invasive procedures were only reluctantly applied. Therefore, a structured educational and skill retention approach aimed at both paramedics and emergency physicians should be implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospective analysis without intervention.

The Use of Parenteral Nutrition and Disparities in Its Allocation Following Traumatic Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Severe traumatic injury requires rapid and extensive deployment of resources to save the lives of the critically injured. The sequelae of traumatic injuries frequently require extensive intervention obligating patients to a complicated recovery process devoid of meaningful nutrition. In this setting, parenteral nutrition (PN) is key in enabling appropriate wound healing, recovery, and rehabilitation. We sought to examine the use of PN in adult trauma management and to highlight any disparities in the utilization of PN in adult trauma patients. METHODS: We queried the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) for adult patients (aged > 18 y) who sustained blunt or penetrating traumatic injuries and received PN as part of their hospitalization. We compared time to PN administration based on demographics. We then used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with the use of PN. We hypothesized that PN would be less commonly employed in the uninsured and minority groups. RESULTS: We identified 2,449,498 patients with sufficient data for analysis. Of these, 1831 patients were treated with PN. On univariate analysis, PN patients were more commonly male (74.7% PN versus 60.2% non-PN; P < 0.001). PN use was more frequent in the Black population (24.3% PN versus 15.5% non-PN; P < 0.001) and less frequent in the White population (72.7% PN versus 81.2% non-PN; P < 0.001). PN use was also much more common among patients covered by Medicaid. Penetrating trauma was over twice as common among PN recipients relative to non-PN patients (% PN versus % non-PN). PN patients had higher injury severity scores (ISSs), more intensive care unit days, longer hospitalizations, and increased mortality compared to non-PN patients. PN patients were half as likely to discharge home and twice as likely to discharge to a long-term care facility. Multivariable analysis including age, race, trauma mechanism, primary payer, and ISS, demonstrated an association of PN use with increasing age (OR 1.01, P < 0.001), cases of penetrating trauma (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; P < 0.001), and patients with high ISS (OR, 0.1.06; P < 0.001). There was decreased use in Uninsured patient (OR, 0.54; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PN use following traumatic injury is rarely required. Patients treated with PN typically have a resource-intense hospital course. More severe injuries, penetrating trauma, and increased age are more likely to result in PN use. Variations in PN use are apparent based on insurance payer, further examination into allocation of hospital and intensive care resources, as it pertains to patient socioeconomic status, is warranted in light of these findings.

National trends and resource associated with recurrent penetrating injury.

BACKGROUND: While recurrent penetrating trauma has been associated with long-term mortality and disability, national data on factors associated with reinjury remain limited. We examined temporal trends, patient characteristics, and resource utilization associated with repeat firearm-related or stab injuries across the US. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). NRD was queried to identify all hospitalizations for penetrating trauma. Recurrent penetrating injury (RPI) was defined as those returned for a subsequent penetrating injury within 60 days. We quantified injury severity using the International Classification of Diseases Trauma Mortality Prediction model. Trends in RPI, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and rate of non-home discharge were then analyzed. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the association of RPI with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of an estimated 968,717 patients (28.4% Gunshot, 71.6% Stab), 2.1% experienced RPI within 60 days of the initial injury. From 2010 to 2019, recurrent gunshot wounds increased in annual incidence while that of stab cohort remained stable. Patients experiencing recurrent gunshot wounds were more often male (88.9 vs 87.0%, P<0.001), younger (30 [23-40] vs 32 [24-44] years, P<0.001), and less commonly insured by Medicare (6.5 vs 11.2%, P<0.001) compared to others. Those with recurrent stab wounds were younger (36 [27-49] vs 44 [30-57] years, P<0.001), less commonly insured by Medicare (21.3 vs 29.3%, P<0.001), and had lower Elixhauser Index Comorbidities score (2 [1-3] vs 3 [1-4], P<0.001) compared to others. After risk adjustment, RPI of both gunshot and stab was associated with significantly higher hospitalization costs, a shorter time before readmission, and increased odds of non-home discharge. CONCLUSION: The trend in RPI has been on the rise for the past decade. National efforts to improve post-discharge prevention and social support services for patients with penetrating trauma are warranted and may reduce the burden of RPI.

Association of Prehospital Neck Wound Survivability and Battlefield Medical Evacuation Time in Afghanistan.

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Military's Golden Hour policy led to improved warfighter survivability during the Global War on Terror. The policy's success is well-documented, but a categorical evaluation and stratification of medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) times based on combat injury is lacking. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System Prehospital Trauma Registry for casualties with documented penetrating neck trauma in Afghanistan requiring battlefield MEDEVAC from June 15, 2009, through February 1, 2021. Casualties were excluded if the time from the point of injury to reach higher level medical care was not documented, listed as zero, or exceeded 4 hours. They were also excluded if demographic data were incomplete or deemed unreliable or if their injuries occurred outside of Afghanistan.We designed a logistic regression model to test for associations in survivability, adjusting for composite injury severity score, patient age group, and type of next higher level of care reached. We then used our model to interpolate MEDEVAC times associated with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of death for an incapacitated casualty with penetrating neck trauma. RESULTS: Of 1,147 encounters, 444 casualties met inclusion criteria. Of these casualties, 430 (96.9%) survived to discharge. Interpolative analysis of our multivariable logistic regression model showed that MEDEVAC times ≥8 minutes, ≥53 minutes, and ≥196 minutes are associated with a 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of mortality from baseline, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data characterize the maximum MEDEVAC times associated with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of death from baseline survivability for penetrating battlefield neck trauma in Afghanistan.

Prehospital and emergency department airway management of severe penetrating trauma in Sweden during the past decade.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital tracheal intubation (TI) is associated with increased mortality in patients with penetrating trauma, and the utility of prehospital advanced airway management is debated. The increased incidence of deadly violence in Sweden warrants a comprehensive evaluation of current airway management for patients with penetrating trauma in the Swedish prehospital environment and on arrival in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter study of all patients with penetrating trauma and injury severity scores (ISSs) ≥ 15 included in the Swedish national trauma register (SweTrau) between 2011 and 2019. We investigated the frequency and characteristics of prehospital and ED TI, including 30-day mortality and patient characteristics associated with TI. RESULT: Of 816 included patients, 118 (14.5%) were intubated prehospitally, and 248 (30.4%) were intubated in the ED. Patients who were intubated prehospitally had a higher ISS, 33 (interquartile range [IQR] 25, 75), than those intubated in the ED, 25 (IQR 18, 34). Prehospital TI was associated with a higher associated mortality, OR 4.26 (CI 2.57, 7.27, p < 0.001) than TI in the ED, even when adjusted for ISS (OR 2.88 [CI 1.64, 5.14, p < 0.001]). Hemodynamic collapse (≤ 40 mmHg) and low GCS score (≤ 8) were the characteristics most associated with prehospital TI. Traumatic cardiac arrests (TCAs) occurred in 154 (18.9%) patients, of whom 77 (50%) were intubated prehospitally and 56 (36.4%) were intubated in the ED. A subgroup analysis excluding TCA showed that patients with prehospital TI did not have a higher mortality rate than those with ED TI, OR 2.07 (CI 0.93, 4.51, p = 0.068), with OR 1.39 (0.56, 3.26, p = 0.5) when adjusted for ISS. CONCLUSION: Prehospital TI was associated with a higher mortality rate than those with ED TI, which was specifically related to TCA; intubation did not affect mortality in patients without cardiac arrest. Mortality was high when airway management was needed, regardless of cardiac arrest, thereby emphasizing the challenges posed when anesthesia is needed. Several interventions, including whole blood transfusions, the implementation of second-tier EMS units and measures to shorten scene times, have been initiated in Sweden to counteract these challenges.

Incidence, demographics and outcomes of patients with penetrating injury: a Japanese nationwide 10-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Unintentional injury remains the leading cause of death among Japanese people younger than 35 years; however, data are limited on the evaluation of characteristics, long-term mortality trend and mortality risk of patients with penetrating injury in Japan. This prevents the development of effective strategies for trauma care in patients with penetrating injury. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study investigated 313 643 patients registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) dataset between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2018. The inclusion criteria comprised patients with penetrating injuries transferred from the injury site by emergency vehicles. Moreover, the patients registered in the JTDB dataset were included in this study regardless of age and sex. Outcomes measured were nationwide trends of characteristics, in-hospital mortality and in-hospital mortality risk among Japanese patients with penetrating injury. The mortality risk was analysed by hospital admission year, age, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and emergency procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 7132 patients were included. Median age significantly increased during the 10-year study periods (from 48 to 54 years, p=0.002). Trends for the mechanism of injury did not change; the leading cause of penetrating injury was stab wounds (SW: 76%-82%). Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate significantly decreased (4.0% to 1.7%, p=0.008). However, no significant improvement was observed in the in-hospital mortality trend in all ISS groups with SW and active bleeding. Patients with active bleeding who underwent urgent transcatheter arterial embolization had significantly lower mortality risk (p=0.043, OR=0.12, 95% CI=0.017 to 0.936). Conversely, the surgical procedure for haemostasis did not improve the mortality risk of patients with SW and active bleeding. CONCLUSION: The severity-adjusted mortality trend in patients with penetrating injuries did not improve. Moreover, patients with active bleeding who underwent urgent surgical procedure for haemostasis had a higher mortality risk.

Risk factors for mortality and morbidity in Syrian refugee children with penetrating abdominal firearm injuries: an 1-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in technology and surgical techniques, abdominal injuries caused by firearms in children are traumatic with high complication rates and mortality. In this study, factors affecting mortality and complications in penetrating abdominal firearm injuries caused by high-velocity bullets and shrapnel in children as a result of the civil war in Syria were evaluated. METHODS: This study was conducted as a case series with 53 patients admitted to Kilis State Hospital with penetrating abdominal firearm injuries between January 2016 and February 2017. Patients aged between 6 months and 17 years who suffered penetrating abdominal firearm injuries (PAFI) as a result of the civil war in Syria in the state hospital in Kilis Türkiye border province with Syria and were transferred to our hospital and operated on were included in the evaluation. Patients' sociodemographic information, time to surgery, number of abdominal organs injured, type of firearm causing injury, presence of large vessel injury and extremity injury, presence of thoracic injury requiring thoracotomy in addition to laparotomy, colostomy, penetrating abdominal trauma index, pediatric trauma score (PTS), and shock status were evaluated. RESULTS: In our study, it was found that a high penetrating abdominal trauma index significantly increased complication rates and mortality (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). In addition, it was found that lower PTSs significantly increased the development of complications and mortality (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients with a PTS>8, whereas mortality was observed in 27.3% of patients with a PTS≤8, and this result was statistically significant (P=0.003). Shock sig-nificantly increased mortality, and no patient who was not in shock died (P<0.001). In our study, it was determined that the increase in the number of injured intra-abdominal organs had a significant effect on both complications and mortality (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: The penetrating abdominal trauma index and PTS were found to be effective in predicting mortality and morbidity in pediatric patients with PAFI. It is crucial in this patient group to provide appropriate transport after the first intervention is done rapidly and effectively in conflict zones.

National trends in prehospital penetrating trauma in 2020 and 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies identified increased penetrating trauma rates during the earlier phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, but there is limited study of penetrating trauma rates in 2021 or at a national level. We evaluated trends in prehospital encounters for penetrating trauma in 2020 and 2021 using a national database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Emergency Medicinal Services (EMS) Information System (NEMSIS) combined 2018-2021 databases of prehospital encounters. We calculated penetrating trauma yearly and monthly rates with 95% confidence; both overall and for each census region. We compared trauma rates in 2020 and 2021 to combined 2018/2019. RESULTS: There were 67,457 (rate of 0.30%) penetrating traumas in 2018, 86,054 (0.30%) in 2019, 95,750 (0.37%) in 2020, and 98,040 (0.34%) in 2021. Nationally, trauma rates were higher from March 2020 to July 2021 than baseline. Penetrating trauma rates from May-December 2021 were lower than May-December of 2020. All census regions similarly had increased trauma rates during from March 2020 to July 2021. CONCLUSION: We identified elevated rates of trauma on 2020 that lasted until July of 2021 that was present in all US census regions.

Retrospective analysis of 261 autopsies of penetrating cardiac injuries with emphasis on sociodemographic factors.

Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCIs) are highly lethal and several factors are related to its incidence and mortality. While most studies focus on characterizing patients who arrived at a medical facility alive and exploring the relationship between the degree of heart compromise and mortality, our study delved deeper into the topic. This study analyzed 261 autopsy reports from 2017 in Bogotá, Colombia, and characterized the factors surrounding PCI incidence and mortality while emphasizing the role of sociodemographic variables. Of these cases, 247 (94.6%) were males with a mean age of 29.19 ± 9.7 years. Weekends, holidays, and late hours had the highest incidence of PCIs. The victims' deaths occurred at the scene in 66 (25.3%) cases, and 65.1% of the victims died before receiving medical care. Upon admission, patients with vital signs were more likely to have been transported by taxi or a private vehicle. Two or more compromised cardiac chambers, increased time of transportation, trauma occurred in the city outskirts, and gunshot wounds were related to increased mortality. Our data is valuable for surgeons, health system managers, and policy analysts as we conducted a holistic assessment of the anatomical and sociodemographic factors that are closely associated with mortality following a PCI. Surgeons must recognize that PCIs can occur even when the entrance wound is outside the cardiac box. Reinforcing hospital infrastructure in the outskirts and improving the availability, accuracy, and response time of first responders may lead to improved patient mortality rates.

Injury characteristics and predictors of mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic excision after abdominal trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) study.

Pancreatic tumors and pancreatitis are the main indications for pancreatic excision (PE). However, little is known about this type of intervention in the context of traumatic injuries. Surgical care for traumatic pancreatic injuries is challenging because of the location of the organ and the lack of information on trauma mechanisms, vital signs, hospital deposition characteristics, and associated injuries. This study examined the demographics, vital signs, associated injuries, clinical outcomes, and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with abdominal trauma who had undergone PE. Following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, we analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank and identified patients who underwent PE for penetrating or blunt trauma after an abdominal injury. Patients with significant injuries in other regions (abbreviated injury scale score ≥ 2) were excluded. Of the 403 patients who underwent PE, 232 had penetrating trauma (PT), and 171 had blunt trauma (BT). The concomitant splenic injury was more prevalent in the BT group; however, the frequency of splenectomy was comparable between groups. In particular, concomitant kidney, small intestine, stomach, colon, and liver injuries were more common in the PT group (all P < .05). Most injuries were observed in the pancreatic body and tail regions. The trauma mechanisms also differed between the groups, with motor vehicles accounting for most of the injuries in the BT group and gunshots accounting for most of the injuries in the PT group. In the PT group, major liver lacerations were approximately 3 times more common (P < .001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.4%, with no major differences between the PT and BT groups. Furthermore, there was no difference between BT and PT with respect to the location of the injuries in the pancreas, with the pancreatic tail and body accounting for almost 65% of injuries. Systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, and major liver laceration were revealed by logistic regression as independent predictors of mortality, although trauma mechanisms and intent were not linked to mortality risk.

Epidemiology, repair technique, and predictors of stroke and mortality in penetrating carotid artery injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Penetrating carotid artery injuries (PCAI) are significantly morbid and deadly, often presenting in extremis with associated injuries and central nervous system deficit. Repair may be challenging with arterial reconstruction vs ligation role poorly defined. This study evaluated contemporary outcomes and management of PCAI. METHODS: PCAI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2018 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between repair and ligation groups after additionally excluding external carotid injuries, concomitant jugular vein injuries, and head/spine Abbreviated Injury Severity score of ≥3. Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and stroke. Secondary end points were associated injury frequency and operative management. RESULTS: There were 4723 PCAI (55.7% gunshot wounds, 44.1% stab wounds). Gunshot wounds more frequently had associated brain (73.8% vs 19.7%; P < .001) and spinal cord (7.6% vs 1.2%; P < .001) injuries; stab wounds more frequently had jugular vein injuries (19.7% vs 29.3%; P < .001). The overall in-hospital mortality was 21.9% and the stroke rate was 6.2%. After exclusion criteria, 239 patients underwent ligation and 483 surgical repair. Ligation patients had lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) than repair patients (13 vs 15; P = .010). Stroke rates were equivalent (10.9% vs 9.3%; P = .507); however, in-hospital mortality was higher after ligation (19.7% vs 8.7%; P < .001). In-hospital mortality was higher in ligated common carotid artery injuries (21.3% vs 11.6%; P = .028) and internal carotid artery injuries (24.5% vs 7.3%; P = .005) compared with repair. On multivariable analysis, ligation was associated with in-hospital mortality, but not with stroke. A history of neurological deficit before injury lower GCS, and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) were associated with stroke; ligation, hypotension, higher ISS, lower GCS, and cardiac arrest were associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PCAI are associated with a 22% rate of in-hospital mortality and a 6% rate of stroke. In this study, carotid repair was not associated with a decreased stroke rate, but did have improved mortality outcomes compared with ligation. The only factors associated with postoperative stroke were low GCS, high ISS, and a history of neurological deficit before injury. Beside ligation, low GCS, high ISS, and postoperative cardiac arrest were associated with in-hospital mortality.

Increased Penetrating Trauma and Trauma Severity During the COVID-19 Lockdown.

The COVID-19 mandated lockdown created unintended outcomes in traumatic injury patterns and psychosocial behaviors compared to previous years during the same timeframe. The aim of this research is to describe a population of trauma patients during the past 5 years to determine particular trends in trauma patterns and trauma severity. A retrospective cohort study on all adult (≥18 years) trauma patients admitted to this ACS verified Level I trauma center in South Carolina, inclusive years 2017 to 2021. A total of 3281 adult trauma patients were included during the lockdown period across 5 years. There was an increase in penetrating injuries in 2020 compared to 2019 (9% vs 4%, P < .01). The psychosocial impacts of government-mandated lockdowns may lead to increased alcohol consumption leading to a higher degree of injury severity and morbidity markers in the trauma population.

Trends of Trauma Admissions in a Rural Trauma Center During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) led to implementing strict social distancing mandates nationwide. This study evaluates the trauma trends during the pandemic at a rural level II trauma center in Pennsylvania. METHODS: A retrospective review of all trauma registries between 2018 and 2021 was performed overall and on a 6-month basis. Injury severity score, injury types-blunt versus penetrating, and mechanisms of injury were compared across the years. RESULTS: A total of 3056 patients in 2018-2019 and 2506 patients in 2020-2021 were evaluated as the historic control and study group, respectively. The median age of the patients was 63 and 62 years in the control and the study group, respectively (P = 0.616). There was an overall significant decline in blunt injuries and an increase in penetrating injuries (Blunt: 2945 versus 2329, Penetrating: 89 versus 159, P < 0.001). Injury severity score was not different across the eras. Falls, motorcycle accidents, motor vehicle accidents, and all-terrain vehicles comprised most of the blunt traumas. Penetrating injuries secondary to assault with firearms and sharp weapons had an increasing trend. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between trauma numbers and the beginning of the pandemic. Overall, there was a decline in trauma numbers during the second 6 mo of the pandemic. There was an increase in injuries involving firearms and stabbing. Rural trauma centers have a unique demographic and admission trend that should be considered while advising regulatory changes during pandemics.

Epidemiology of cranial infections in battlefield-related penetrating and open cranial injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating brain injuries are a potentially lethal injury associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We examined characteristics and outcomes among military personnel who sustained battlefield-related open and penetrating cranial injuries during military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: Military personnel wounded during deployment (2009-2014) were included if they sustained an open or penetrating cranial injury and were admitted to participating hospitals in the United States. Injury characteristics, treatment course, neurosurgical interventions, antibiotic use, and infection profiles were examined. RESULTS: The study population included 106 wounded personnel, of whom 12 (11.3%) had an intracranial infection. Posttrauma prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in more than 98% of patients. Patients who developed central nervous system (CNS) infections were more likely to have undergone a ventriculostomy ( p = 0.003), had a ventriculostomy in place for a longer period (17 vs. 11 days; p = 0.007), had more neurosurgical procedures ( p < 0.001), and have lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale ( p = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores ( p = 0.018). Time to diagnosis of CNS infection was a median of 12 days postinjury (interquartile range, 7-22 days) with differences in timing by injury severity (critical head injury had median of 6 days, while maximal [currently untreatable] head injury had a median of 13.5 days), presence of other injury profiles in addition to head/face/neck (median, 22 days), and the presence of other infections in addition to CNS infections (median, 13.5 days). The overall length of hospitalization was a median of 50 days, and two patients died. CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of wounded military personnel with open and penetrating cranial injuries developed CNS infections. These patients were more critically injured (e.g., lower Glasgow Coma Scale and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores) and required more invasive neurosurgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Association of insurance status with financial toxicity and outcome disparities after penetrating trauma and assault.

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity, or the impact out-of-pocket medical expenses have on the quality of life, has not been widely enumerated in the trauma literature. We characterized the relationship between insurance status and the risk of financial toxicity after trauma and associated risk factors. METHODS: Adults admitted for gunshot wounds, other penetrating injuries, or blunt assault were identified from the 2015 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample. The outcome of interest was a risk of financial toxicity with separate regression models for uninsured and insured populations. RESULTS: Of an estimated 775,665 patients, 21.2% were at risk of financial toxicity. Patients at risk of financial toxicity were younger, more commonly male, less commonly White, and had a lower Elixhauser Index (Table 1). A higher proportion of uninsured patients were at risk of financial toxicity (40.8% vs 17.7%, P < .001) than insured patients. Whereas the proportion of uninsured patients at risk of financial toxicity significantly increased from 2015 to 2019, it was unchanged in insured patients. After adjustment, non-income demographic and clinical factors were not associated with the risk of financial toxicity amongst the insured. Conversely, the Black or Hispanic race, gunshot wounds, and any in-hospital complications were some factors associated with increased risk of financial toxicity in uninsured patients. CONCLUSION: An increasingly larger proportion of uninsured patients are at risk of financial toxicity after trauma. The risk of financial toxicity among the uninsured was more complex than in the insured and associated with race, gunshot wounds, and complications. Increasing insurance access and the adoption of trauma-informed care practices should be used to address financial toxicity in this population.

Adolescent Gun Violence Shows an Age Group to Focus Trauma Prevention.

INTRODUCTION: Gun violence continues to escalate in America's urban areas. Peer groups of gun wound victims are potential targets for violence prevention initiatives; identification of this cohort is pivotal to efficient deployment strategies. We hypothesize a specific age at which the incidence of penetrating trauma increases significantly in adolescence, below which should be the focus on future trauma prevention. METHODS: Adolescent trauma patients with gunshot wounds seen from July 2011 through June 2021 at a well-established, urban, academic level 1 trauma center were reviewed retrospectively and grouped by age. A linear regression and repeated measured analysis of variance evaluated the change in gunshot wound victims over this time, grouped by age. Demographics were extrapolated, and standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1304 adolescent trauma patients were included. Those aged 15 y and under had an unchanged incidence of gunshot wounds. However, those aged 16 y and more experienced the majority of increased gun violence; 92% were Black and 90% were male with a mortality of 12%. Adolescents aged 15 y and below were 95% Black and 84% male, with a mortality of 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention efforts to mitigate gun violence should be focused on adolescents below 16 y of age. Prevention of gun violence should include community outreach efforts directed toward middle school-aged children and younger, hoping to decrease the incidence of injury due to gun violence in older adolescents in the future.